Saturday 28 December 2013

The Exposed Affections in Psalm 119


 Psalm 119 is not only the longest psalm written in scripture, but also one that displays a lot of affection for the Lord’s commands. This has been one psalm that I really wanted to know, and I certainly wouldn’t say that I’ve plumbed the depths of this beautiful psalm. But there had been something bothering me all this time, as I was reading this psalm and reading how the psalmist had unbounding affection for the Lord’s precepts, commands, statutes and instruction…I couldn’t help but ask myself “why? Why does he have so much affection for the Lord’s instruction?” I read the psalm again and again, in search for my answer, carefully reading into the verses that speak of where the Psalmist’ heart was at. And then I prayed…

It was as if I couldn’t see the forest through the trees, I wanted to know so much why the Psalmist had an abundant delight in the Lord’s commands. So I asked God to reveal it to me and there it was, staring right at me, a single verse that gave greater meaning to every line of affection exposed in this great psalm!

I will never forget Your precepts,
for You have given me life through them. Psalm 119:93

This one verse took on a new light of the entire psalm for me, and it was as if I was questioning myself at the same time “do I delight in the Lord’s commands under the new covenant in the same way?” I began reading the preceding verses and I also noticed something else about the Psalmist’ affections.

I have not turned from Your judgments,
for You Yourself have instructed me. Psalm 119:102

The Psalmist exposes an intimate relationship in the delight of knowing the Lord’s instructions, as one who is instructed by the Lord! I believe this psalm speaks volumes of how we as Christians should respond knowing that it is Christ who established a new covenant with His people and allows us to delight in His instruction. Do we as Christians remember the Lord’s commands because He has provided life through them? Do we as Christians fear the Lord rightly knowing that He has personally instructed us through His word? Dear friends I would encourage you all to know this psalm, to know the affections that this Psalmist is displaying and to know why the psalmist takes delight in the Lord’s commands. To know this is to know that God has provided life through His word!

Tuesday 24 December 2013

The Other Side of The Nativity Narrative


The Other Side of The Nativity Narrative

I want to look at the birth of Christ in a different light. I want to focus on the actions of King Herod and his response after hearing of the birth of Christ.

After Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of King Herod, wise men from the east arrived unexpectedly in Jerusalem, 2 saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we saw His star in the east[a] and have come to worship Him.”[b]

3 When King Herod heard this, he was deeply disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him. Matthew 2:1-3

 I believe King Herod knew that his position as king was threatened, and since the rest of Jerusalem was under the reign of the Roman Empire at the time, it makes perfect sense why the rest of Jerusalem was also largely disturbed. The birth of Christ was so significant that it could make a powerful king shake in his royal boots. So how does a king deal with such a threat? Like what any king would do to protect his own position, but let us consider how far Herod was willing to go in order to maintain his position on the throne.

After they were gone, an angel of the Lord suddenly appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying, “Get up! Take the child and His mother, flee to Egypt, and stay there until I tell you. For Herod is about to search for the child to destroy Him.” Matthew 2:13


Herod sort out to kill Christ. Consider this for a minute; this is the Roman Empire under full control of Jerusalem. The Roman Empire that has its historical name for being the proverbial juggernauts in battle, and the king is in fear of this new born Jesus Christ. None of this makes ANY sense…unless the birth of Christ was foretold by the prophets.

 So he assembled all the chief priests and scribes of the people and asked them where the Messiah would be born.

5 “In Bethlehem of Judea,” they told him, “because this is what was written by the prophet:

6 And you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah,
are by no means least among the leaders of Judah:
because out of you will come a leader
who will shepherd My people Israel.” Matthew 2:4-6

And so Herod as we read later on from verse 16, flew into a fit of rage and kills every male child under the age of two, so as we should let us consider the value of Christ’ kingship when observing these biblical truths. Herod certainly knew that Jesus was the Christ, the messiah, the one to take the royal throne over His people. Herod certainly acted on this truth, but in a way that was undeniably wicked! How much more should we as Christians respond in a way that is glorifying to God, knowing that Christ is king over our lives? We should likewise fear God but in a way that honours His position as king. John Piper once said (in paraphrasing) “the fear of God is not drawing back away from God when you’ve sinned, but knowing that He’s sovereign and running back to Him!”  

 

Sunday 8 December 2013

World Mission Society Church of God – part 2


World Mission Society Church of God – part 2

 In part one of this article blog series, I presented a partial summary of beliefs within the Church of God. The belief in the mother god and the belief in a second Christ named Ahnsahnghong. As I also pointed out within the first article, the COG also believes that we as human beings are fallen angels. I will be exposing this belief in light of scripture and more doctrinal beliefs within the COG, in particular the influence that Ahnsahnghong has had on many millions of followers. Let’s begin by looking at the idea that we as humans are an actual state of fallen angelic beings according to the Church of God.

One of the main passages that COG uses for backing up their belief that all humans are fallen angelic beings comes from Proverbs 8:22-31.

22 “The Lord made[a] me
at the beginning of His creation,[b]
before His works of long ago.
23 I was formed before ancient times,
from the beginning, before the earth began.
24 I was born
when there were no watery depths
and no springs filled with water.
25 I was delivered
before the mountains and hills were established,
26 before He made the land, the fields,
or the first soil on earth.
27 I was there when He established the heavens,
when He laid out the horizon on the surface of the ocean,
28 when He placed the skies above,
when the fountains of the ocean gushed out,
29 when He set a limit for the sea
so that the waters would not violate His command,
when He laid out the foundations of the earth.
30 I was a skilled craftsman[c] beside Him.
I was His[d] delight every day,
always rejoicing before Him.
31 I was rejoicing in His inhabited world,
delighting in the human race.

Here is the argument that COG put forth in their belief that we are fallen angels. ““In the above verses, “I” designates Solomon, who was the third king of Israel. When he wrote the book of Proverbs, he stated that he already existed before the creation of the earth. From this, we can see that he existed as a spiritual being before he came to this earth─that he lived in the angelic world, the kingdom of God.” © WMSCOG English WATV.org - Accessed on 24/11/2013.” Assuming that the “I” used is referring to Solomon, the COG misunderstand the personified meaning that this is purely God’s wisdom expressed. When we observe the beginning of Proverbs 8, we can see that this proverb is personified in its form.

Doesn’t Wisdom call out?
Doesn’t Understanding make her voice heard?
2 At the heights overlooking the road,
at the crossroads, she takes her stand.” Proverbs 8:1-2

By observing scripture from the premise of knowing the author’s written intentions and what the author has intended to convey, we can distinguish between eisegetical and exegetical language. A good way to begin with scripture is by asking yourself “what is the author’s intentions of this passage? Is my interpretation biblically accurate?” If you struggle interpreting scripture in a biblical way, observe commentaries that might help you understand the meaning of the scripture.

 As for Ahnsahnghong, I had done a little research on this man. And a lot of the information that is available is written in Korean. There was a massive problem when I started investigating who Ahnsahnhong was. The reason for this is that I wanted to essentially uncover the reason behind his preaching of the ‘mother god’. However when I found some info on this, Ahnsahnhong never supported the teachings of a ‘mother god’. During the time that Ahnshanhong was alive, a woman by the name of UmSooln apparently claimed to be the ‘mother god’. After Ahnsahnhong’s death in 1985, it was the WMSCOG that gave a new name to the ‘mother god’, ZhangGilJah. Ahnsahnhong never claimed to be the second Christ as what I first indicated in part one of my blog entries; instead he claimed to be the prophet Elijah (still quite strange if you ask me). The reason it’s so hard to profile Ahnsahnghong is because there’s a lot of information that reveals the inconsistencies of the Church of God’s doctrine. For more information, I recommend visiting this site http://www.examiningthewmscog.com/. This site has citations and some of Ahnsahnghong's writings have been translated into english.

 

Thursday 5 December 2013

Before You Send Your Kids to University…


This is a short blog entry that I want to express what’s been on my heart lately. This blog is for the parents and the young men and women who are considering university or college studies. I’m in my second year at Murdoch University based in Perth (I study via correspondence). As a Christian I will tell you this straight up, your worldview will constantly be attacked, this may be directly or indirectly. The one plea I have with godly Christian parents is this, please please don’t send your children to a secular university until they know the gospel and going to university is their primary mission to share the gospel.

I did an introductory course a couple of years ago and they taught us a lot about worldviews. They taught some truth but not all truth, what do I mean by that? The course never explored ‘how’ people assume their own worldview. They taught more or less that it’s everyone’s right to a worldview (which isn’t wrong). What they left out was information that is extremely vital in allowing Christians to have an excellent foothold in good apologetics, it’s called presuppositions.

Presuppositions are essentially the things that are presupposed. For example, before even discussing the cosmic evolution theory, a lecturer might presuppose that God doesn’t exist and therefore truth itself might be relative. Presupposition argumentation allow for a Christian to take out the pillars that hold up the secularist worldview. It’s dangerous, because you’re exposing the inconsistencies within their worldview. It’s an argument that has no effective counter argument to it. That’s why I say it’s dangerous because the premise of using this argument should effectively be out of love for the non-believer.

This argument works for the religious and non-religious people. It’s ‘nuclear’ as professor Greg L. Bahnsen would have it put. It’s easy to trust in the argument more so than the gospel, so like anything pray before using this. Remember this is just a tool in order to share the truth of the gospel. That’s why I plead with parents to not send their children to university until they know the gospel. I’ve posted up a youtube video of Greg L. Bahnsen’s first lecture on the ‘Myth of Neutrality’; this is an important position to know since secular lecturers still love to use this trick in the lecture halls. I also recommend purchasing Greg L. Bahnsen’s book “Pushing the Antithesis”, it’s a great book based on all 5 lectures which are all on youtube and I highly recommend viewing each one of them.

Tuesday 3 December 2013

The False Impressions of ‘Celebritised’ Christianity


The False Impressions of ‘Celebritised’ Christianity

The one thing that has me frustrated recently is many articles and apparent Christian quotations from Paul Walker who died recently in a car accident. Paul Walker was well known for his star role in ‘The Fast and Furious’ movie series. Many of these articles are quoting Paul Walker as a Christian, and therefore we as Christians should be at peace with his death as a response. I want to make it very clear that I’m not attacking Paul Walker, nor am I saying that Paul Walker is in hell. As a Christian I strongly believe that judgment completely rests in God’s hands. At the same time, there are signs of knowing what to look for in a true believer.

Jesus says in Matthew 7:15-17

“Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravaging wolves. 16 You’ll recognize them by their fruit. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 In the same way, every good tree produces good fruit, but a bad tree produces bad fruit.”

In this particular passage Jesus speaks of two kinds of people, both outwardly agreeing to be believers in some measure. However there’s a distinguishing difference between the two, both might appear to have come from the same proverbial tree but the outward signs of the fruit show what is produced is either good or bad. So what is good fruit? In Galatians 5:22-23 we see the signs of the fruit of the Spirit.

Galatians 5:22-23

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faith,[a] 23 gentleness, self-control. Against such things there is no law.

These are the essential fruits of knowing a true believer. Jesus goes on in saying in Matthew 7:21-23

“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord!’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to Me, ‘Lord, Lord, didn’t we prophesy in Your name, drive out demons in Your name, and do many miracles in Your name?’ 23 Then I will announce to them, ‘I never knew you! Depart from Me, you lawbreakers!

Jesus emphasises that although a person may emphatically call Jesus Christ ‘Lord’, it most certainly doesn’t save them. And they may very well have done many things, even miracles but still be cast out as a lawbreaker. So what does the difference look like? Jesus certainly doesn’t leave anyone in the dark on this one! He goes on to explain what is meant by the above statement.

Matthew 7:24-27

“Therefore, everyone who hears these words of Mine and acts on them will be like a sensible man who built his house on the rock. 25 The rain fell, the rivers rose, and the winds blew and pounded that house. Yet it didn’t collapse, because its foundation was on the rock. 26 But everyone who hears these words of Mine and doesn’t act on them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand.
27 The rain fell, the rivers rose, the winds blew and pounded that house, and it collapsed. And its collapse was great!”

Jesus speaks here of two kinds of people. Both of which are actively building houses yet the house that survives is grounded on the rock. Essentially Jesus is saying that unless your life is so dependent upon Christ, than you’re building on sand! We should be a people who continually check the foundation for what it is we’re building our lives on. Do the things we do and say reflect the glory of God?

As I mentioned earlier, I do not have the power to say “Paul Walker is in hell!” But as a Christian who has read and understood these passages, it is clear that Christ has given us a foundation of understanding true biblical Christianity. So what does true biblical Christianity look like in a celebrity?  Consider someone like Tim Tebow, the American footballer who has made frontline in sporting magazines, sporting interviews and who openly shares his faith about Christ. I admire someone like Tebow who puts Christ first above his celebrity career, he’s a man who checks the foundation to make sure he’s building on the rock!